BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//UNISCAPE - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:UNISCAPE
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.uniscape.eu
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for UNISCAPE
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Rome
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20240331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20241027T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20231116T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20231116T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20230309T170502Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230309T170502Z
UID:6375-1700155800-1700155800@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM 8_23 Lecture | Knowledge and landscape: Landscapes of Knowledge vs Landscapes of Oblivion | CANCELED
DESCRIPTION:16th November 2023\nCANCELED \n\n\n\nKnowledge and landscape: Landscapes of Knowledge vs Landscapes of Oblivion \nby Ruth VARELA\, Unidad de investigación pARQc\, ETSAC\, Universidade da Coruña \n\n\n\n\nGeneral subject area | landscape theory \nAbstract | As the Greek poet Simonides of Ceos (c. 556-468 BC) empirically discovered\, all our memories are associated with a place; a topos. Only forgeRng is placeless\, or\, in other words\, every memory needs a spa\,al context. In fact\, there are a number of very interes\,ng metaphors that express forgeRng. Thus\, for example\, when memory is presented as a landscape\, the metaphors of forgeRng are related to barren or uncul\,vated land\, wastelands or abandoned wells. But it must be said that our era has become forgeUul\, forgeUul of itself\, forgeUul of memory. And in this forgeUulness\, it has distanced itself from knowledge of the landscape.\nThis paper will offer a theore\,cal framework and a series of examples that will allow us to understand the fact that for many centuries\, and thanks to the development of the techniques of the art of memory\, the prac\,ces of knowledge genera\,on and the prac\,ces of the produc\,on of meaning became\, on more than a few occasions\, landscape prac\,ces. At the same \,me\, landscape prac\,ces became a great laboratory for tes\,ng the most varied prac\,ces of knowledge genera\,on and the produc\,on of meaning. It should be recalled here that the French philosopher Se?bas\,en Marot explains in his work Suburbanism and the Art of Memory that the Ars topiaria “was a great laboratory for the seman\,sa\,on of territory”.\nThe influence of the techniques of the art of memory and the prac7ces of memory on landscape architecture and contemporary crea\,on linked to the landscape will also be discussed. And\, finally\, it will try to show with significant examples that the art of memory\, and the prac7ces of memory\, have been\, and con\,nue to be\, one of the most relevant methodologies in the process of knowing\, understanding and\, also\, projec\,ng the landscape. \n 
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-8_23-lecture-knowledge-and-landscape-landscapes-of-knowledge-vs-landscapes-of-oblivion/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20231012T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20231012T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20230309T170322Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230309T170322Z
UID:6373-1697131800-1697131800@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM 7_23 Lecture | Understanding Preferences for Rural Landscapes
DESCRIPTION:12th October 2023\n17.30 (CET) | REGISTRATION LINK \n\n\n\nUnderstanding Preferences for Rural Landscapes \nby Cathal O’DONOGHUE\, University of Galway\, Paul KILGARRIFF\, Luxembourg Institute of Socio- Economic Research\, and Mary RYAN\, Teagasc \n\n\n\n\n\nGeneral subject area |  Landscape preference modelling \nAbstract | The purpose of this study is to understand public preferences for different landscapes. Our aim was to categorise landscapes in terms of identifiable attributes and to assess the public’s preference for different types of landscape.\nThe first part of this study undertakes a choice experiment\, utilising a survey of landscape preferences. We use a statistical methodology to extract individual preferences for different rural landscapes as defined by images. Using Ireland as a case study\, we conducted a survey consisting of 430 individuals\, asked for their preferences through the use of 50 rural landscape photographs.\nInitial results show that individuals prefer managed agricultural landscapes that contain stonewalls and hedgerows and a negative preference for rough unmanaged landscapes\, industrial peat harvesting and wind turbines. Heterogeneity is also found between urban and rural dwellers. With increasing levels of development and urban expansion\, it is important to preserve not only protected habitats but also landscapes that are highly valued by local residents and society as a whole. In order to protect the latter\, we need to establish what society values and where these areas are located.\nIn this study we decompose landscape photos into individual attributes and quantify the preferences for each attribute. Using this set of environmental attributes\, we use open-source spatial data to present each attribute spatially for the wider landscape. For example\, a high Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) score is used for green pasture\, stonewalls in areas that have limestone bedrock and agriculture present. By only using European-wide data\, the methodology outlined is scalable when combined with a regional choice experiment to reflect local preferences. Ireland is divided into a grid of 400m cells. Each cell is assigned landscape attributes on the basis of the characteristics that can be measured within the grid.\nUtilising our the preference model estimated\, we can generate a public preference (both in terms of the national population and in terms of the local population) for the visible landscape characteristics. Of interest is the different between the public’s view and expert views. We compare in two dimensions\, preferences for landscapes compared with expert based Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) and with the biodiversity potential of the landscape.\nThe results show the areas that are highly valued by individuals do not correspond to the areas that are highly valued in expert-led studies such as the (LCA). In terms of biodiversity\, we find that the public have similar preferences for biodiverse landscapes with experts\, except in the case of peatland. This highlights a potential issue for future planning and environmental policy and a need for improved education in relation to the biodiversity value of peatland. If provision is only made to protect the landscapes valued by environmental experts\, landscapes that are highly valued by society are left unprotected and vulnerable to being damaged or lost. \nRegister in advance for this lecture After registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. Participation is free. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n 
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-7_23-lecture-understanding-preferences-for-rural-landscapes/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20230622T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20230622T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20230309T165919Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230309T165919Z
UID:6369-1687455000-1687455000@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM 5_23 Lecture | Applying the Latin America Landscape Initiative
DESCRIPTION:22th June 2023\n17.30 (CET) | Zoom\nREGISTRATION LINK \n\n\n\nApplying the Latin America Landscape Initiative Principle\n \nby  Martha FAJARDO\, Claudia MISTELI\, LALI Network \nIntroduction by Daniela COLAFRANCESCHI\, University of Naples “Federico II” \n\n\n\n\nGeneral subject area |  landscape observatory; landscape and well-being; landscape policy and governance \nAbstract | “The Latin American Landscape Initiative (LALI ) is  is a declaration of fundamental ethical principles to promote the recognition\, valuation\, protection\, management\, and sustainable planning of Latin American landscapes by means of the adoption of agreements (laws-accords-decrees-regulations) that recognize local\, regional\, and national diversity and values\, tangible so much as intangible\, of landscape\, as well as principles and processes to safeguard it”. \nRegister in advance for this lecture After registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. Participation is free. \n  \nMartha Fajardo is a Colombian Landscape Architect\, with a master’s degree in landscape design and a receiver of the Honorary Degree of Doctor of Letters (DLitt)\, from The University of Sheffield. She is also an architect. She has over 38 years’ experience in leading national and international roles\, playing a key role in establishing the profession in countries all around the globe. Martha is founder and CEO of Grupo Verde SAS (www.grupoverdeltda.com)\, a firm dedicated to the professional practice of Landscape Architecture\, Landscape Urbanism and Urban Design\, in the company of the Japanese urban planner Noboru Kawashima.\nFormer President of the International Federation of Landscape Architects (IFLA)\, the only professional body representing all landscape architects on a global level. She cofounded and was the first President of the Colombian Society of Landscape Architects (SAP)\, and Honorary member.\nShe cofounded and chaired the Latin American Landscape Initiative (LALI)\, a bottom-up movement with a horizontal\, transdisciplinary\, and cross-cutting trajectory that brings together civil society\, academia\, public institutions\, and other parties to safeguard the Latin American landscapes.\nMartha is at the Board of Directors member of Nature of Cities (TNOC) a creative collective to strive for cities worldwide that are resilient\, sustainable\, livable\, and just. \nClaudia Misteli\, Social communicator\, journalist and social designer\, interested in how design\, communication and social innovation can shape and reshape a more resilient and sustainable future. A strong believer that empathy\, creativity\, cooperation and the force of landscape opens up infinite opportunities to build better societies\, more connected to nature and people. Her main projects have been in the field of strategic communication and social innovation. She is currently volunteering in the Latin American Landscape Initiative LALI as leader of the Communication and Participation Cluster. She also collaborates with The Nature of Cities at TNOC Festival as curator and content creator. She currently works at Platoniq Foundation in Barcelona Spain\, supporting the design of digital participatory processes and facilitating innovative participatory methodologies to contribute to build more democratic and just societies and organisations\, using open civic technologies. \nDaniela Colafranceschi is Architect\, Phd in Architectural Design\, Full Professor of Landscape Architecture\, at the Federico II University of Naples (Italy)\, DIARC Department.\nAt the Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria (1991-2022) she was Responsible for international relations and Erasmus activities and Coordinator of PhD course on Landscape Architecture. She is also Professor of the PhD on Landscape and Environment of the University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’ and was External Expert of the PhD in Landscape Architecture of the University of Florence.\nShe is President of IASLA (Italian Academic Society of Landscape Architecture)Associacion and member of the Executive Board of UNISCAPE.\nShe is Visiting Professor for the Universities: ETSAB\,UPC\,UPF\,UAB of Barcellona; ENA-Rabat (Morocco);TU Addis Abeba (Ethiopia);Pinar del Rio (Cuba); Lusiada (Portugal) UTH (Greece)\, Montevideo and Salto-FARQ (Uruguay); UN\,UCC\,UNER eUNL (Argentina) and Critic Visiting at the Pennsylvania University\, Philadelphia LD (USA) and KU Leuven (Belgium). She is Scientific Responsible of the European Erasmus Programme CHANGING LANDSCAPES. MEDITERRANEAN SENSITIVE AREAS DESIGN” (2008-11).\nSince 2000 she is also the series Director of “Land&Scapes” books for the Gustavo Gili- that awared an Honorable Mention at PremiFAD 2011- and Director of the L&SCAPE Series for Libria. \n  \n  \n 
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-5_23-lecture-applying-the-latin-america-landscape-initiative/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20230608T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20230608T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20230309T164838Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230309T164838Z
UID:6364-1686245400-1686245400@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM 4_23 Lecture | Improve the landscape through community work
DESCRIPTION:8th June 2023 | 17.30 (CET)\nZoom REGISTRATION LINK \nGuidelines to improve the landscape through community work in neighbourhoods situated on slopes in Quito\, Ecuador \nby Mayte Alejandra CUESTA TABARES\nRespondent: Tayana PASSOS ROSA \n\n\n\nGeneral subject area | Landscape and community \nAbstract | Due to the Ecuadorian social-cultural background\, community work has been always existing under the Kichwa language name of “Minga” which consists of collective work for the betterment of physical space. Ecuadorian people have an immense load of indigenous cultures and features\, one of them is guard the nature and water as the first provider in the settlement. Unfortunately\, this attribute is being lost due to the growth of the city. On one hand\, Quito\, the capital of Ecuador counts with 182 streams\, all polluted by wastewater\, sewage\, and garbage. And on the other\, the high cost of living in the hyper center has led the population to abuse hillside\, ravine land and build settlements that do not meet basic living requirements. Most of these neighborhoods have a high probability of disaster due to earthquakes\, alluvion\, rains\, etc and they are strongly contributing to the degradation of the natural landscape around the ravines. Therefore\, the settlements have polluted the streams and rivers widening the already existing infrastructure gap in the city. \nThe aim is to describe the main characteristics of Minga\, study cases of neighborhoods that have helped to recover landscape through community work in damaged areas\, specifically in slopes or ravines near to rivers in urban areas\, and approach intervention guidelines to develop the landscape situated in slopes in the city of Quito. \nRegister in advance for this lecture After registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. Participation is free. \nMayte Cuesta is an architect who graduated from the Central University of Ecuador\, where the main focus was architectural and urban design. Her main aim is to focus on the social value and community work as the main source of design\, considering the importance of the reciprocity in the territory and how inhabitants can be an active part of changing cities. \nTayana Passos Rosa \, Ph.D. student at the Doctoral School of Landscape Architecture and Landscape Ecology at the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences (MATE-Hungary). With a Degree in Product Design from the Federal Institute of Santa Catarina (IFSC-Brazil). She participated and tutored in the LED2LEAP and OLA projects and her present research work is about applying Landscape Design principles and Design-Based Learning for Environmental Literacy in school communities from different sociocultural backgrounds
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-4_23-lecture-guidelines-to-improve-the-landscape-through-community-work/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20230413T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20230413T235959
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20230309T163821Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230309T163821Z
UID:6354-1681344000-1681430399@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM 2_23 Lecture | Planetarity: Landscapes of Double Consciousness
DESCRIPTION:13th April 2023\n17.30 (CET) | Zoom REGISTRATION LINK \n\n\n\nPlanetarity: Landscapes of Double Consciousness\nby Tim WATERMAN\, Bartlett School of Architecture\, University College London\nRespondent: Ed WALL\, University of Greenwich\n\nGeneral subject area | landscape architecture; landscape theory; landscape heritage; landscape ecology; landscape democracy; consciousness; future and planetary imaginaries \n\n\n\n\nAbstract | In 1903 W.E.B. Du Bois elaborated the idea of double consciousness in his The Souls of Black Folk. Black Americans\, he argued\, were forced to see the world and themselves through the eyes of a white supremacist society. The idea of double consciousness has since been enriched by queer theory\, feminism\, gender studies\, and more\, with ‘triple consciousness’ and other framings added to and enlarging Dubois’s original theory. In this paper we argue that landscapes are likewise perceived and experienced in their plurality\, through double\, triple\, multiple consciousness. Landscapes are the scenography of earthly power and financial might\, but also the dialogic milieu of everyday lives. These are in conflict\, but also result in hybrid formations as well as contestation and resistance. All landscapes in the world now express this multiplicity\, whether as the result of settler colonialism\, or the ways in which the same forces of imperialism transformed (and continue to transform) lives and landscapes at colonialism’s centre. In this paper we map two particular poles of understanding\, landscapes of globality and planetarity. We explore globality as cartographic\, imperial\, and employing the language of colonialism\, plantation\, emparkment\, and enclosure. In contrast we argue that planetarity is more dialogic\, relational\, and expressed in commonality\, sharing\, care\, and management. While we recognise these two faces of landscape are in conflict\, we contend that they also exist simultaneously in the same landscapes\, often sharing the same consciousness\, looking out through the same eye sockets. Understanding this not just as a duality\, but as a trialectic enfolding hybrids and mutations\, becomes a tool for working and thinking with all landscapes more effectively. \nRegister in advance for this lecture After registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. Participation is free. \n\n\n\n\nBibliography:\n\n– Du Bois\, W.E.B. (2007 [1903]) The Souls of Black Folk. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n– Olwig\, Kenneth R. (2011) ‘The Earth is Not a Globe: Landscape versus the ‘Globalist’ Agenda’\, Landscape Research\, 36:4\, 401-415\, DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2011.582940 \n– Spivak\, Gayatri (2015) ‘Planetarity’ in Paragraph\, Vol. 38\, No. 2\, Translation and the Untranslatable (July 2015)\, 290-292. Edinburgh University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44016381 Accessed 30 Dec 2021. \nTim Waterman is Professor of Landscape Theory and Acting Director of Architecture History and Theory at the Bartlett School of Architecture\, UCL. His research addresses imaginaries: moral\, political\, social\, ecological\, radical\, and utopian. This forms the basis for explorations of power and democracy and their shaping of public space and public life; taste\, manners\, customs\, belief and ritual; and foodways in community and civic life and landscape. He is Chair of the Landscape Research Group (LRG)\, a Non-Executive Director of the digital arts collective Furtherfield\, and an advisor to the Centre for Landscape Democracy of the Landscape and Spatial Planning Institute at NMBU in Norway. He is the author of The Landscape of Utopia: Writings on Everyday Life\, Taste\, Democracy\, and Design and editor of Landscape Citizenships with Ed Wall and Jane Wolff\, Landscape and Agency: Critical Essays with Ed Wall\, and the Routledge Handbook of Landscape and Food with Joshua Zeunert. His writing has appeared in a variety of journals including the Journal of Architecture\, Garden Design Journal\, Utopian Studies\, and Landscape Architecture Magazine. His brother is the experimental musician\, writer\, and producer Alex Waterman. \nEd Wall‘s research and design experimentation explores practices of public space and processes of landscapes through concerns for spatial justice. As Professor of Cities and Landscapes\, he leads Landscape Architecture and Urbanism at the University of Greenwich\, London. He is a Visiting Professor at Politecnico di Milano\, and in 2017\, was City of Vienna Visiting Professor: Urban culture\, public space and the future–urban equity and the global agenda (SKuOR/TU Wien). He is a Design Council Expert in the UK and a member of the Board of Experts for the European Prize for Urban Public Space (CCCB).
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-2_23-lecture-planetarity-landscapes-of-double-consciousness/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20230323T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20230323T235959
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20230309T162908Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230309T162908Z
UID:6349-1679529600-1679615999@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM 1_23 Lecture | Moving Horizons. A landscape manifesto
DESCRIPTION:23th March 2023\n17.30 (CET) | ZOOM | REGISTRATION LINK \nMoving Horizons\, design praxis through soil transformation. A Landscape Manifesto\nby Vittoria MENCARINI\, Ph.D\, University of Ferrara; Ravenna Public Administration\, Natural Area Office \nRespondent: Margherita VANORE\, Univerisità IUAV Venezia \nGeneral subject Area | landscape architecture; landscape theory; landscape observatory; landscape ecology \nAbstract | Moving horizon was born as a doctoral investigation that moves across research and design dimension. It explores the relationship between landscape design and soil transformation\, focusing on the mutual effects and potential disciplinary developments aiming at structurally linking the two fields. \nThe soil is one of the most complex biomaterials on Earth in continuous exchange with the terrestrial systems. With humanity today being Earth’s primary geomorphic agent\, the quality of human life and the earth’s environment had never depended more on soil management than it does today.\nThe starting assumption is that\, the soil is a condition of inherent shifting in landscape evolution both in physical and semantic relationship. \nThe value of soil as an element of planning and design lies in handling live and dynamic physical matter. From being ‘background’ for the built environment\, the soil transformations become the ‘foreground’ both in landscape design praxis and in theoretical implications\, by embedding the soil as a palimpsest in reading and writing the landscape. The framework produced by this assessment has been condensed in 10 propositions\, collected in form of a Landscape Manifesto. A first application of Moving Horizon approach has been developed and tested in the Ravenna Climate Change Adaptation Plan (Italy)\, by identifying a planning procedure capable of integrating territorial adaptation measures to climate change. \nThe result is not the proof of a theorem but the discovery of an unexpected point of view. The Moving Horizon approach implicitly criticises traditional landscape practice’s seemingly uncritical reproduction of stereotypical ‘aestheticised’ images. It is not a question of rejecting or abandoning a formal and compositional language\, but rather of encouraging a view that favours investigation and observation of reality in its different stratifications offered by embedding the soil as a palimpsest in “reading” and “writing” the landscape. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRegister in advance for this lecture \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. Participation is free. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nBIBLIOGRAPHY\n\n\n\n\n\n– Antonioli\, F.\, Anzidei\, M.\, Amorosi\, A.\, Lo Presti\, V.\, Mastronuzzi\, G.\, Deiana\, G.\,Vacchio\, A. (2017). Sea- level rise and potential drowning of the Italian coastal plains: Flooding risk scenarios for 2100. Quaternary ScienceReviews (158)\, 29-43.\n– Adhikari\, K.\, & Hartemink\, A. E. (2016). Linking soil to ecosystem services – A global review. Geoderma(262)\, 101-111.\n– Antrop\, M.\, & Van Eetvelde\, V. (2019). Territory and/or scenery : concepts and prospects of Western landscape research. In L. Mueller\, & F. Eulenstein\, Current Trends in Landscape Research (p. 3-39). Cham\, Switzerland: Springer.\n– Belanger\, P. (2014). Ecology 5.0. (D. I. Katsikis\, A cura di) New Geographies – Grounding Metabolism(06)\, 184- 187. Tratto da www.gsd.harvard.edu/newgeographies\n– Belanger\, P. (2016). Altitudes of Urbanization. (R. Sterling\, N. Bobylev\, edited by) Urban Underground Space: a growing imperative\, perspective and current research in planning and design for underground space use -Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology (55)\, 5-7.\n– Belanger\, P. (2016). Landscape as Infrastructure. London: Routledge.\n– Capra\, F. (1996). The Web of Life: A New Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor Books. – Clement\, G. (2015). Piccola pedagogia dell’erba. Riflessioni sul giardino planetario. (L. Jones\, A cura di)\nRoma: Derive Approdi.\n– European Commission (2020). Caring for soil is caring for life. Brussels: European Commission.\n– Corboz\, A. (1983). The Land as a Palimpsest. Diogenes\, 31(121)\, 12–34.\n– Corner\, J. (1999). Recovering Landscape. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.\n– Corner\, J. (2006). Terra fluxus. In C. Waldheim (A cura di)\, The Landscape Urbanism Reader (p. 21-33).\nNewYork: Princetown Architectural Press.\n– Corner\, J.\, & Bick Hirsch\, A. (2011). The Landscape Imagination\, Collected essays of James Corner\n1990-2010.New York: Princeton Architectural Press.\n– Corner\, J.\, & MacLean\, A. (1996). Taking measure across the American Landscape. London: Yale University Press.\n– Di Giulio\, R.\, Emanueli\, L.\, & Lobosco\, G. (2018). Scenarios’ Evaluation by Design\, Un approccio per\nscenari al tema della resilienza. Techne(15)\, 92-100.\n– Doherty\, G.\, & Waldheim\, C. (2016). Is Landscape…? Essay on the Identity of Landscape. New York:\nRoutledge.\n– Ellis\, E. C. (2014). Ecologies of the Anthropocene: Global Upscaling of Social-Ecological Infrastructures.\n(D.I. Katsikis\, A cura di) New Geographies – Grounding Metabolism(06)\, 20-27.\n– Emanueli L.\, Lobosco G. (2018). Scenarios’ Evaluation\, in Emanueli L. (ed.)\, Riviera Reattiva. Quodlibet\,\npp. 107-113.\n– ENEA Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie\, l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile. (2018).\n– ENEA Eventi Cambiamenti climatici e variazioni del livello del Mar Mediterraneo. Roma: Edizioni ENEA\n– FAO\, & ITPS. (2015). Status of the World’s Soil Resources. Rome: FAO.\n– FAO Food and Agriculture Organization. (2014). World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International\nsoil classification system for naming soils. Rome: FAO.\n– Farina\, A. (2010). Ecology\, Cognition and Landscape. Dordrecht: Springer.\n– Farina\, A. (2008). The Landscape as a Semiotic Interface between Organisms and Resources. Biosemiotics (1)\, 75-83.\n– Farina\, A. (1998). Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology (2nd edition ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.\n– Farinelli\, F. (2007). L’invenzione della Terra. Palermo: Sellerio Editore.\n– Finke\, P. (2016). Soil and Landscape. In S. Northcliff (A cura di)\, Task Force: Soil Matters – Solutions\nunder foot (p. 8-10). Reiskirchen\, Germany: Catena Verlag.\n– Forman\, R. T. (2008). Ecology and Planning Beyond the city. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n– Girot\, C. (2013). Immanent Landscape. Harvard Design Magazine (36)\, 6-16.\n– Girot\, C. (2013). The elegance of topology. In C. Girot (edited by)\, Landscript 3. Topology. Topical\nthought on the contemporary Landscape (p. 79-115). Berlino: Jovis.\n– Gustavson K.\, (2016)\, Is landscape…philosophy? In (edited by) Doherty\, G.\, & Waldheim\, C. (2016). Is\nLandscape…? Essay on the Identity of Landscape. New York: Routledge.\n– Hobbs\, R. J.\, Arico\, S.\, Aronson\, J.\, Baron\, J.\, Bridgewater\, P.\, Cramer\, V.\, Zobel\, M. (2006). Novel\n– Ecosy-stems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology\nand Biogeography(15)\, 1-7.\n– IPCC Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change. (2019). Climate Change and Land. IPCC Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change. Geneve: IPCC press\n– IPCC Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change. (2019). Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing\nClimate.Geneve: IPCC press\n– ISPRA Istituto Superiore per la Ricerca e la Protezione Ambientale. (2011). L’italia perde terreno. Il\nconsumo di suolo e il degrado del territorio. Rome: ISPRA.\n– Ibanez\, D.\, & Katsikis\, N. (2014). Grounding Metabolism. (D. Ibanez\, & N. Katsikis\, A cura di) New Geographies – Grounding Metabolism (06)\, 2-9.\n– Izard\, T. G. (2019). Regenerative Empathy: Complex Assemblages in a Shared Environment. Cambridge: Harvard University.\n– Laureano\, P. (2001). The Water Atlas\, Traditional Knowledge to compat desertification. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.\n– Laureano\, P. (2013). La Piramide Rovesciata\, il Modello dell’Oasi per il Pianeta Terra. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.\n– Lister\, N. M.\, & Reed\, C. (2014\, Aprile). Ecology and Design: parallel Genealogies. Places journal.\n– Lobosco G.\, Mencarini V. (2020)“Landscape and climate change. A resilient strategy for the adaption plan of the Ravenna area in Italy”\, in the international review “Convergencias\, Journal of Research and Arts\nEducation\, edited by Escola Superior de Artes Aplicadas (Portugal) – published on the 30 of November 2020\n– Markewitz\, D.\, & Richter\, D. D. (2001). Understanding Soil Changes\, Soil Sustainability over Millennia\,\nCenturies\, and Decades (2007 ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n– Logan\, W. B. (2017). The Ecstatic Skin of the Earth (Reprint Edition ed.). New York\, USA: W W Norton &\nCo Inc.\n– Naveh\, Z. (2000). The Total Human Ecosystem: Integrating Ecology and economics. Bioscience\, 50(4)\,\n357-361\n– Odum\, H. T. (1971). Environment\, Power and Society. New York: Wiley-Interscience.\nPanzini\, F. (2005). Progettare la Natura. Bologna: Zanichelli.\n– Perini\, L.\, Calabrese\, L.\, & Luciani\, P. (2018). Rischi costieri da mareggiata in Emilia Romagna e analisi\nscenari futuri. Oral Presentation at 1st National Workshop on CLimate Change and Sea Level Rise in the Mediterranean Sea\, 5th-6th July 2018\, Regione Emilia Romagna\, Servizio geologico sismico e dei suoli\, Roma.\n– Presti\, V. L. (2018). Risalita relativa del livello del mare\, proiezioni sulla vulnerabilita ed erosione. Mappe con scenari di rischio allagamento previsto al 2100. Oral Presentation at 1st National Workshop on Climate Change and Sea Level Rise in the Mediterranean Sea\, 5th-6th July 2018\, Rome.\n– Richter\, D. D. (2007). Humanity’s Transformation of Earth’s Soil: Pedology’s New Frontier. Soil Science\, 112(12)\, 957-067.\n– Secchi\, B. (1986). Progetto di suolo. Casabella(520)\, 19-24.\n– Viganò\, P. (2020). Palimpsest Metaphor: Figures and Spaces of the Contemporary Project. Urban\nPlanning \, 167-171.\n– Waldheim C.\, Desmini J. (2016) Cartographic Grounds: Projecting the Landscape Imaginary New York:\nPrinceton Architectural Press \n  \n\nVITTORIA MENCARINI\nArchitect\, post degree master in Landscape Architecture\, PhD in Landscape Architecture. Her professional practices and research activities move around the relationship between landscape design and soil transformation on several scale of intervention. She supported the Municipality of Ravenna in the draft of the planning of adaptation measure to climate change and landscape projects concerning the preservation of protected areas and design practices focusing on improvement of soil health. Worked as facilitator in participative processes in planning process\n(such as General Urban Plan in Ravenna in 2019\, Territorial Mapuche Plan Management in 2011 at Pucon\, Chile). Since July 2021\, she has been working at the Municipality of Ravenna\, as designer and building site director in Naturalistic Area office. She is also in charge to the SECAP (Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan) dissemination and implementation. \nMARGHERITA VANORE\nArchitect and PhD\, Full Professor in Architectural and Urban Design at the Università Iuav di Venezia\, she teaches for the degree courses in Architecture and at the SSIBAP School of Specialization in Architectural and Landscape Heritage. She conducts research on the project for the contemporary city\, the landscape and the historical-cultural heritage and was in charge of the local research unit for PRIN 2015 The city as cure and the care of the city. In the Iuav Excellence Department of “Architecture and Arts”\, she coordinates the laboratory PRIDE_Pro Research in Integral Design Environment for the Research Infrastructure IR.IDE. Among her publications: Suoli urbani all’ombra dei viadotti (2002)\, Infrastrutture Culturali (2010); Archaeology’s Places and Contemporary Uses (2011-12-13)\, Heritage of Water. Patrimonio e paesaggi di bonifica (2015)\, Necessità dell’oblio. Patrimoni e paesaggi costruiti dall’acqua (2016) Paesaggi in produzione tra terra e acqua (2018)\, Architetture e spazi di sottovia (2019)\, Forme e spazi del benessere tra risorse\, modelli\, regole e valori (2019)\, Il valore della variazione (2020)\, Città-paesaggio (2021)\, #CURACITTÀ Venezia vs Marghera e la città-paesaggio (2021).
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/online-lecture-wdm-1_23-moving-horizons-design-praxis-through-soil-transformation-a-landscape-manifesto/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220927T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220927T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20220920T203153Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220920T203153Z
UID:6236-1664299800-1664299800@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:Where the Disciplines Meet Lecture – September 2022
DESCRIPTION:27 September\, 17.30 (CET) \n  \n(Un)certain lines and landscapes. Marginal coastal landscapes in the climatic crisis \nSpeaker: Laura CIPRIANI\, TU Delft Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment \nDiscussant: Antonio LONGO\, Politecnico di Milano \nGeneral subject area: Landscape Design through Research\n \n  \nDue to the climatic crisis\, coastal areas on the planet will face an uncertain future. If thematic literature and projects have mainly focused on coastal lines facing large cities worldwide\, marginal coastal landscapes\, mainly agricultural with low levels of urbanization\, are partly neglected in the debate.\nThis contribution intends to reflect on the (un)certain marginal landscapes and lines of Northeast Italy. This territory – from Marano Lagoon to the Po River Delta – and its people are facing an uncertain future\, while currently wrestling with a latent climatic\, economic-productive and social crisis. Eustatism\, subsidence\, soil erosion\, saltwater intrusion\, industrial and agricultural water pollution\, dying economic activities testify to a territory in the throes of long-term repossession by the sea. Which design interventions\, tools\, and methods can be implemented and used in this state of uncertainty? \nBibliography \nCipriani\, L. (2020)\, ‘Scenarios for the Polesine\, the Po River\, and its delta – Italy’\, in T. Fisher\, B. Orland\, C. Steinitz\, The International Geodesign Collaboration. Changing Geography by Design\, ESRI Press\, Redlands\, California\, pp. 54-55.\nCipriani\, L. (2019)\, (Fr)agile terra. Paesaggi di crisi e possibilità. 01 La bassa friulana\, Università Iuav di Venezia\, Venice.\nCipriani\, L. (2017)\, Isole di possibilità. Venezia e la città laguna. Islands of possibilities. Venice and the lagoon city\, Aracne editrice\, Rome. \n  \n\nSpeaker\nLaura Cipriani is an assistant professor at TU Delft. She has taught for a decade landscape architecture and landscape urbanism at IUAV\, Politecnico di Milano\, National University Singapore\, Venice International University\, and the University of Padua. She holds Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Architecture from IUAV (Hons 2001)\, a Master in Design Studies in landscape and urban studies from Harvard Design School (Hons 2004)\, and a Ph.D. in Urbanism from IUAV (2008). In 2010 she was awarded the EU Marie Curie research grant (ass. prof. level)\, and since 2014 she has had the Italian Associate Professorship title. In 2008 she founded Superlandscape\, a landscape\, and urban design office.\n\nDiscussant\nAntonio Longo is an architect and urban designer. He is an associate professor of Urban Planning at Politecnico di Milano where he directs the Master‘s Degree Course in “Landscape Architecture Land Landscape Heritage.” His work is focused on the relationship between landscape and urban design. Since 2001 he has coordinated numerous applied research and publicly funded projects concerning the processes of land and landscape transformation and management and the relationship between landscape and infrastructures.
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/where-the-disciplines-meet-lecture-september-22/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220614T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220614T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20220520T134718Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220520T134718Z
UID:6140-1655227800-1655227800@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:Where the Disciplines Meet Lecture - June 22
DESCRIPTION:14 June\, 2022\n\nDiversity of knowledge systems in terraced landscapes: clue for sustainability \nSpeaker: Hermann J. TILLMANN\,  Coordinator of ITLA\, the International Terraced Landscapes Alliance \nGeneral subject area : Landscape knowledge\, landscape ecology\, cultural landscapes\, epistemologies of the South \nTerraced landscapes exist as human heritage in many mountain regions in all continents. The terraces were created thousands of years ago on all continents as an optimum technology to produce food managing soils\, climate\, biodiversity\, solar energy in mountain areas. The local conditions resulted in a diversity of knowledge systems to manage the land sustainably. Colonial invasions and western technologies have damaged the local know- ledge systems affecting the tradicional management of mountain slopes. Recovery of the traditional ecological knowledge and the review of the development concepts will lead to methods of knowledge dialogues which create a wider horizon for the reconsideration of terraced landscapes as sustainable alternatives based on local cultural cosmovisions. I will present an intercultural methodology of approaching different knowledge systems and creating spaces of co-creation with local initiatives for a frevised concept of sustainability. \nBibliography \n\nDenevan\, William (2002) Cultivated landscapes of native Amazonia and the Andes. Oxford University Press\, Oxford\nDonkin\, R. A. (1979) Agricultural terracing in the aboriginal New World. Viking Fund publi- cations in anthropology #56\, Tucson\, Arizona\nEarls\, John; Cervantes\, Gabriela (2015) Inka cosmology in Moray. Astronomy\, agriculture\, and pilgrimage. In: Shimada\, Izumi: The Inka Empire. A multidisciplinary approach. pp. 121 – 145 University of Texas Press\, Austin\nMaffi\, L. and E. Woodley (2010) Biocultural Diversity Conservation: A Global Sourcebook. Earthscan\, London\nSalas\, M.; Tillmann\, T. (2018) Participatory Action Research: Visualizing terraced landscapes from Asia\, Europe and Latin America. Annales 28\, 4\nSandor\, Jon; WinklerPrins\, A.; Barrera-Bassols\, N.; Zinck\, A. (2006) The heritage of soil knowledge among world’s cultures. In: Warkentin\, Benno: Footprints in the soil. People and ideas in soil history\, pp. 43 – 85. Oregon University\, Oregon\nSantos\, Boaventura de Souza (2014) Epistemologies of the south. Justice against epistemicide. Paradigm\, Boulder\nTillmann\, T (1997) Las Estrellas no mienten… Agricultura y ecología campesina en Jauja – Peru. Abya-Yala\, Quito\, Ecuador.\nToledo\, Victor M.; Barrera-Bassols\, N. (2008) La memoria biocultural. La importancia ecológica de las sabidurías tradicionales. Icaria\, Barcelona
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/where-the-disciplines-meet-lecture-june-22/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220509T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220509T170000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20220509T104444Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220509T104444Z
UID:6079-1652083200-1652115600@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:Where Disciplines Meet Lecture - May 2022
DESCRIPTION:11 May 2022\n \nWind Energy and Culture of the Landscape. Guidelines for an adequate installation \nSpeakers: Daniela COLAFRANCESCHI\, University of Reggio Calabria “Mediterranea”; Fabio MANFREDI\, University of Genoa\, Pere SALA\, Landscape Observatory of Catalonia \nGeneral subject area: landscape observatory/landscape ecology/landscape policy and governance/landscape and community \nLandscape and Energy represent an inseparable and innovative binomial because of the challenges they implies and on which we measure the quality of our habitat. The landscape design interprets the convergence of territorial values with the innovation of an energy system: it is not measured on a geographical scale\, but draws from geography the sense of an overwriting of everyday places to which it gives sense and orientation\, meaning and narration.\nBesides presenting the report “Wind Energy and Landscape. Guidelines for a suitable installation in Catalonia”\, i.e. a research into the methodology for installing wind farms\, the session presents a critical reflection on the possible spatial\, ethical and aesthetic effects.\nThe research – an experience conducted by the Landscape Observatory of Catalonia\, on behalf of the Generalitat – moves in a dialectical position between ecology\, society\, nature and culture and does it by overturning the approach: not the project for a correct installation of wind power plants\, but the project for a wind power plant capable of enhancing the territory\, in a new and unified landscape configuration. Energy of the wind and the culture of the landscape as a new ‘contemporary nature’. The aim is an advancement of thought on design tools\, that espouses the dictates of the European Landscape Convention and more recent ambitious goals set by the UN with the 2030 Agenda. \nBibliography \n\nCastiglioni\, B. Paesaggio e percezione: Un binomio antico\, nuove prospettive\, questioni aperte. In Paesaggio E Benessere; Anguillari\, E.\, Ferrario\, V.\, Gissi\, E.\, Lancerini\, E.\, Eds.; Franco Angeli: Milano\, Italy\, 2011; pp. 34–45.\nNogué\, J. L’esperienza polisensoriale ed emozionale del paesaggio; Etica ed Estetica del paesaggio. In Paesaggio Territorio\, Società Civile. Il Senso Del Luogo Nel Contemporaneo; Libria: Melfi\, Italy\, 2017; pp. 105–130.\nRoger\, A. Breve Trattato Sul Paesaggio; Sellerio: Palermo\, Italy\, 2009.\nUN\, 2030 Agenda\, The Sustainable Development Goals. 2015. Available online:\nhttps://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).\nPrados Velasco\, M.J.; Baraja Rodríguez\, E.; Frolova Ignateva\, M.; Espejo Marín\, C. Integración paisajística y territorial de las energías renovables. Ciudad y Territ. Estud. Territ. 2012\, 171\, 127–143.\nBusquets\, J.; Muñoz\, F. Guia D’estudis D’impacte I Integració Paisatgística. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Política Territorial i Obres Públiques: Observatori de la Urbanització\, UAB\, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. 2010. Available online: https://cataleg.ub.edu/record=b2226967 (accessed on 15 May 2021).\nApostol\, D.; Palmer\, J.; Pasqualetti\, M.; Smardon\, R.; Sullivan\, R. The Renewable Energy Landscape: Managing and Limited Aesthetic Landscapes; Routledge/Taylor & Francis: London\, UK\, 2015.\nSijmons\, D. IABR 2014-Urban by Nature; Brugmans\, G.\, Strien\, J.\, Eds.; IABR: Rotterdam\, The Netherlands\, 2014.\nGeneralitat De Catalunya Pla Territorial Sectorial De La Implantació Ambiental De L’energia Eòlica A Catalunya. 2002. Available online: https://www.apabcn.cat/Documentacio/areatecnica/legislacio/0206007.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2021).\nGeneralitat De Catalunya Normes D’ordenació Territorial. Directrius De Paisatge. Pla Territorial De Les Comarques Gironines. 2010. Available online: http://www.catpaisatge.net/fitxers/directrius/Directrius%20Paisatge_CG.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2021).\nGeneralitat De Catalunya Ponència De Sòl No Urbanitzable. 2013. Available online:\nhttps://territori.gencat.cat/web/ .content/home/06_territori_i_urbanisme/04_sol_no_ur banitzable_i_paisatge/sol_no_urbanitzable/criteris/criteris_paisatge_ construccions_ai llades.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2019).\nCouncil of Europe. European Landscape Convention. 2000. Available online: https://www.coe.int/en/web/landscape/the- european-landscape-convention (accessed on 20 February 2021).\nLandscape Observatory Of Catalonia. Presentació. In Wind Energy and Landscape. Guidelines for A Suitable Installation in Catalonia. 2020. Available online: http://www.catpaisatge.net/fitxers/eeolica_i_paisatge.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2021).\nFrolova\, M. Los paisajes de la energía eólica: Su percepción social y gestión en España. In Nimbus; Universitat de Almeria: Almeria\, Spain\, 2010; pp. 93–110.\n\n  \nDaniela Colafranceschi\, PhD in Architectural Design\, she is Full Professor in Landscape Architecture in the Faculty of Architecture at the ‘Mediterranea University’ of Reggio Calabria\, where she has been engaged in academic work since 1991. Between 2007 and 2012 she was head of International Relations in the faculty. She was also director of the international Erasmus Programme “Changing Landscape: Mediterranean Sensitive Areas Design” from 2008 to 2011. She is member of the Executive Board of UNISCAPE (European Network of Universities for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention) and\, since 2018\, of the executive board of IASLA (Italian Academic Society of Landscape Architecture). \nPere Sala i Martì Degree in Environmental Sciences at the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB). Director of the Landscape Observatory of Catalonia. He was its Coordinator from the year 2005 to 2017. As such\, he supervised the Landscape Catalogues of Catalonia. His work addresses the integration of landscape issues into public policies\, the implementation of landscape policies in Europe\, and the link between landscape and development from national to local levels. \nFabio Manfredi\, PhD in Landscape Architecture\, he is researcher at DAD Department University of Genova. From 2011 to 2021 he was Adjunct professor at the University of Naples Federico II and Roma Tre University\, visiting professor at Lisboa Lusiada University (Portugal)\, University of Thessaly (Greece)\, KU- Leuven (Belgium)\, TU-Delft (The Nethelands). He carried out research activities of national interest at Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria and University of Naples Federico II
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/where-disciplines-meet-lecture-may-2022/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220315T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220315T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20220303T100852Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220303T100852Z
UID:5956-1647365400-1647365400@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM2-Lecture 2: ‘Designing-with’: Towards designing landscapes where species meet.
DESCRIPTION:15 March 2022\, 17.30\n \n‘Designing-with’: Towards designing landscapes where species meet. \nSpeaker: Bert de Roo\, Glenn Deliège\, Center for Decentering Design\, University of applied sciences and arts Ghent – HOGENT & Howest\, Belgium \nRespondent: Andrea Gammon\, TU Delft\, The Nederlands \nGeneral subject area: Landscape architecture\, landscape heritage\, landscape and community\, landscape ecology \nThis research project takes its cue from the growing realization that we humans are not the only ones with a point of view on this planet. Animals do too. They develop meaningful relationships with the landscape they inhabit\, scaffolded by their own history\, culture and individuality. Just like is the case with humans\, these meaningful relationships congeal into material reality: animals do not only connect passively with a world ready-made and out there\, but actively build and shape their environment. They do so in relation to us and all other creatures: the worlding of the world is always a ‘becoming-with’\, a multispecies achievement in which the reverberating actions of myriads of creatures continuously give rise to the world. \n\n\n\nIn this ‘entangled biocultural inheritance’\, designing as well is always a ‘designing-with’: a multispecies\, interdisciplinary process of weaving new stories. To enable this ‘designing-with’ we propose\, in our case study on a typical historical estate in Flanders\, to approach the historical site not as a physical element within the landscape\, but as a More-than-Human network unique in space and time. This has two consequences. Firstly the physical structure is no longer the object of discussion\, protection or design\, but the product of that network of actors. Together they shape their landscape. Secondly\, if we understand the More-than-Human network as unique in space and time – exactly this group of actors will not exist in this constellation in another place or time. Together they not only shape the landscape but are shaped by it as well. By interfering in and transforming the network of actors (visualizing or strengthening existing relationships\, exploring new relationships or introducing new actors) we explore the consequences of our proposal and develop new interdisciplinary design methods on the boundary of digital design\, landscape design and interior design to reshape the landscape together. \nParticipation is free. To attend the online lecture please REGISTER on Zoom \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. \n  \n\n\n\nBibliography \n\nIngold\, Tim. “Taking Taskscape to Task.” In Forms of Dwelling : 20 Years of Taskscapes in Archaeology\, edited by Ulla Rajala. 2017.\nMartin\, Richard J. “Imagining Landscapes: Past\, Present and Future\, Edited by Monica Janowski and Tim Ingold.” Anthropological Forum 25\, no. 1. 2015.\nVan Dooren\, Thom. “Flight Ways : Life and Loss at the Edge of Extinction.”. 2014.\nDiSalvo\, Carl\, and Jonathan Lukens. “Nonanthropocentrism and the Nonhuman in Design: Possibilities for Designing New Forms of Engagement With and Through Technology.” From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen. Eds. Marcus Foth\, Laura Forlano\, Christine Satchell\, and Martin Gibbs. 2012.\nHaraway\, Donna. Staying with the Trouble : Making Kin in the Chthulucene. 2016.\n\n\n \nDr. A.R. (Andrea) Gammon is Assistant Professor of Ethics & Philosophy of Technology at TU Delft\, with a focus on engineering ethics education. She manages the section’s teaching portfolio and is the MSc Graduation Coordinator for EPT. She began teaching at TU Delft in 2018. Andrea’s main philosophical background is in environmental philosophy. She’s interested in a range of environmental topics\, and her research has focused on rewilding and interpretations of place and landscape (Ph.D.\, 2018) and philosophy of technology and ethics of climate engineering (M.A.\, 2013).
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/designing-with-towards-designing-landscapes-where-species-meet/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220215T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20220215T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20220211T153514Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220211T153514Z
UID:5928-1644946200-1644946200@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:Where Disciplines Meet Lecture Series 1/2022
DESCRIPTION:15 February 2002\, 17:30   \nCommunity Scales. Toward a socially transformative pedagogy in design and planning. A critical reflection. \nSpeaker: Ellen Fetzer\, Nürtingen-Geislingen University\, Germany\nRespondent: Arati Amitraj Uttur\, ECLAS\, Le:Notre Institute \nGeneral subject area: landscape democracy\n\nEveryone has the right to access\, belong to and participate in decisions about the landscape of their communities. Design and planning professionals play a vital role in making cities sustainable and promote greater environmental justice\, yet they often see participation as an obstacle to their creativity or are unaware of its benefits. To change these perceptions\, students and young professionals should be offered opportunities to learn about their agency in shaping democratic\, supportive communities and practice participation. \nThe Erasmus+ Landscape Education for Democracy (LED/LEAD2LEAP) projects aim at educating design and planning students about the theories\, methods\, and practices of landscape democracy. Students from many institutions can access the course online. In 2016\, a series of online seminars started which until 2021 included around 300 students worldwide. They collaborate on a strategic vision for resolving a landscape democracy challenge within their local communities\n.\nThe performance of the seminar to reach its goals and ambitions was tested through pre and post engagement surveys of both teachers and students. The participatory action research includes the transformative action of teachers\, students and the agents in the community on a personal\, professional and systemic/political level. Results revealed that while the students valued the opportunity to learn about participation and landscape democracy in a multidisciplinary and cross-cultural context\, the discontinuous commitment of some group members and the operationalizion of landscape democracy proved challenging. Nonetheless\, they called for more opportunities within their university’s curricula to refine their social agency skills. They also expressed doubts that they would be able to pursue this type of work in private practice. The paper ends with lessons for educators interested in democratic design and planning education. \nParticipation is free. To attend the online lecture please REGISTER on Zoom \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. \n  \nBibliography \n\nFetzer\, Ellen with Ruggeri\, Deni (2019)\, (Ed.): Landscape Education for Democracy. Co-creating a socially-engaged landscape planning and design education for sustainable development\, Special Issue InBo\, University of Bologna\, Vol. 10 No. 4: https://in-bo.unibo.it/issue/view/816\n\n  \n \nDr. Ellen Fetzer\, LED2LEAP Project Coordinator: Ellen Fetzer holds a diploma and a doctoral degree in landscape planning from Kassel University\, Germany. At Nürtingen-Geislingen University she is primarily coordinating the international masters in landscape architecture (IMLA). Another focus is on computer supported collaborative learning and transnational education. She also collaborates with colleagues from the business field on social innovation\, landscape economy and entrepreneurship. Ellen is currently president of ECLAS\, the European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools. \n  \nArati Uttur\, Social media and Communications coordinator for ECLAS\, Le:Notre Institute and JoLA.  Arati recently completed the Master program at IMLA and during this time she has tutored several IMLA international seminars\, like the Community Learning for Local Change (CLLC) with the focus on Middle East Social Innovation Labs(MESIL)\, LED2LEAP and the Language\, Culture Landscape Seminar\, that run within the IMLA Programme. With a background of design for educational spaces during her previous architectural profession\, Arati presently focuses on inculcating sustainable thinking in young minds through food landscapes in elementary and secondary educational environments.
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/where-disciplines-meet-lecture-series-1-2022/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211207T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20211207T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20211201T181725Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211201T181725Z
UID:5785-1638898200-1638898200@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM Lecture: Water as Resource and Heritage between City and Landscape
DESCRIPTION:ZOOM REGISTRATION\n\nby Margherita Vanore (Università Iuav di Venezia) \n\n\nwith a comment by Stefano Tornieri (Università Iuav di Venezia)\n\n\n\n\nrespondent: Laura Cipriani (Delft University of Technology – TU Delft) \n__________________________________________________________\n\nHydrogeological instability and various calamities increasingly direct the pursuit of so-called “best practice” in respect of maintenance and safety of the territory. The complexity of the phenomena we are observing\, however\, demands upstream reflection\, so that research can extend the field of investigation beyond the specificity of “technical solutions” to encompass values as well as natural processes. As a living expression of cultures and practices that combine in a systemic vision that is capable of supporting beauty as well as sustainable living and production environments\, the landscape is an essential referent in respect of current and future problems. In this regard\, it is essential to understand and enhance the role of cultural and environmental heritage that is defined by water. The history of soil modeling has transmitted to us a heritage of technical forms\, born of water management and aimed both at particular production processes and at making the territory safe. Revisiting water landscapes in all their complexity— in particular those of the river belt\, agricultural reclamation\, lagoons and delta areas — and foregrounding their heritage values can generate new design approaches capable of protecting and enhancing the landscape itself. In such cases\, the project can only be based on a specific process of reading\, redesigning and reinterpreting the physical and phenomenal characters of places\, and in particular earthworks\, “soil architecture”\, built for different typologies of water management\, use and production\, historically and in the present. Water landscapes are still governed by an infrastructural system that ensures the life and the hydrogeological balance of emerged lands. \n\n_____________________________________________________ \nMargherita Vanore \n\nArchitect and PhD\, Full Professor in Architectural and Urban Design at the Università Iuav di Venezia\, she teaches for the degree courses in Architecture and at the SSIBAP School of Specialization in Architectural and Landscape Heritage. She conducts research on the project for the contemporary city\, the landscape and the historical-cultural heritage and was in charge of the local research unit for PRIN 2015 The city as cure and the care of the city. In the Iuav Excellence Department of “Architecture and Arts”\, she coordinates the laboratory PRIDE_Pro Research in Integral Design Environment for the Research Infrastructure IR.IDE.\nAmong her publications: Suoli urbani all’ombra dei viadotti (2002)\, Infrastrutture Culturali (2010); Archaeology’s Places and Contemporary Uses (2011-12-13)\, Heritage of Water. Patrimonio e paesaggi di bonifica (2015)\, Necessità dell’oblio. Patrimoni e paesaggi costruiti dall’acqua (2016) Paesaggi in produzione tra terra e acqua (2018)\, Architetture e spazi di sottovia (2019)\, Forme e spazi del benessere tra risorse\, modelli\, regole e valori (2019)\, Il valore della variazione (2020)\, Città-paesaggio (2021)\,#CURACITTÀ Venezia vs Marghera e la città-paesaggio(2021).\n\n \n \n \n \n\n\nStefano Tornieri\, Master Degree in Architecture in 2010\, Ph.D in architectural composition in 2015 at University Iuav of Venice. During the doctoral studies he is Visiting Fellow at CEAU (study center architecture and urbanism) at FAUP University of Porto. Actually he is Research Fellow at IR.IDE (Infrastructure Research Integral Design environment) of University Iuav of Venice. At the same time he is founder of Babau Bureau\, Architecture and Landscape Bureau in Venice\, nominated at the EU Mies Van Der  Rohe Award 2019 and curator of Grenada Pavilion at the 17 biennale of Venice.  \nLaura Cipriani is assistant professor in Landscape Architecture at TU Delft. She has taught landscape architecture and landscape urbanism for a decade at IUAV\, Politecnico di Milano\, National University Singapore\, Venice International University\, and the University of Padua. She holds Bachelor and Master degrees in Architecture (Hons) from IUAV (2001)\, a Master in Design Studies (Hons) on landscape and urban studies from Harvard Design School (2004)\, a Ph.D. in Urbanism from IUAV (2008). From 2009-2012 she was awarded the EU Marie Curie research grant (ass. prof. level)\, and since 2014 she has had the Italian Associate Professorship title. Her interest is currently on marginal landscapes of crisis – landscapes which are affected by several climatic\, environmental\, social and economic states of crisis and which require a holistic approach. \n\n\n\n\n\nRegister in advance for this lecture \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. Participation is free.
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-lecture-water-as-resource-and-heritage-between-city-and-landscape/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210914T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210914T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20210111T180008Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210111T180008Z
UID:5109-1631640600-1631640600@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM online Lecture: The Architects’ sense for the landscape
DESCRIPTION:14 September 2021\,  17:30\nThe Architects’ sense for the landscape\n \nSpeaker: Renato Bocchi (Università IUAV di Venezia)\nRespondent: Paolo Bürgi (Architect\, Professor of Landscape Architecture) \n\n\n\n\nThe landscape in the foreground today on the contemporary scene is in fact a new landscape\, which must deal with the rapid territorial change\, with the serious problems of resource consumption\, climate change\, economic crisis\, and which however cannot and must not forget the themes of history\, of memory and above all of culture (material and non-material) on which even new landscapes can and must be reconfigured. \nOverwriting the landscape-palimpsest is inevitable to affirm a serious design culture towards that “perception of the populations” to which the European Landscape Convention refers. The ways of this overwriting are to be found in a rich and profound interdisciplinary dialogue and in the re-foundation that can derive from this for the design disciplines. \nThe November Talks 2020 at the Iuav University of Venice\, held with the support of Sto-Stiftung\, aimed to offer contributions to the debate around the relationship that contemporary architecture has often tried to establish with the figurative spatial and topographical aspects of landscape\, as well as with its characteristics of dynamically changing perception\, also developing\, on the other hand\, an evident interest in ecological problems. \nThis attitude has fostered a rich dialogue between architects\, landscape architects and “environmental” artists\, in an attempt to compare and combine the architectural design tools with the landscape design and environmental art ones. The six architectural firms invited for the talks (Marpillero+Pollak\, Abalos+Sentkiewicz\, Batlle+Roig\, Reiulf Ramstad Arkhitekter\, Palerm+Tabares\, A2 Architects) were chosen from the wide range of important contemporary architects whose research has developed the theme of new landscapes in original ways\, to the point of profoundly connoting their design responses according to this influence. The conference paper summarizes the results of those encounters. \nRenato Bocchi (Trento\, 1949)\, full professor of architectural and urban design at the Iuav University of Venice until 2019\, where he was director of the Department of architectural design from 2006 to 2009. He is currently teaching Theories of architecture at Iuav. The main field of his research concerns the relationship among architecture\, art and landscape. Among his publications: La materia del vuoto\, Universalia\, Pordenone\, 2015; Progettare lo spazio e il movimento\, Gangemi\, Rome\, 2010. \n  \nPaolo L. Bürgi is adjunct professor of Landscape Architecture at the University of Pennsylvania since 1997\, at POLIMI in Milano since 2015 and at the IUAV\, Istituto Universitario di Architettura di Venezia\, Italy\, since 2003. He was visiting professor at the Università Mediterranea degli Studi in Reggio Calabria\, Italy\, and at the School of Architecture\, Columbus Ohio. His projects mainly deal with open space design and planning in connection with architecture in the public and private sector. He has presented papers at conferences in Canada\, USA\, Argentina\, Chile\, China\, Corea and throughout Europe\, and his articles and design work have been published in a wide range of specialist literature. His work was awarded several times\, including in 2003 when he was awarded the ‘European Landscape Award Rosa Barba’ in Barcellona. His practice is based in Camorino\, Switzerland. \nRegister in advance for this lecture \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. Participation is free.
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-online-lecture-the-architects-sense-for-the-landscape/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210504T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210504T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20201222T120055Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201222T120055Z
UID:5061-1620149400-1620149400@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM online lecture: Agroforestry\, energy plantations
DESCRIPTION:04 May 2021\, 17:30  \nAgroforestry\, energy plantations and landscape management: land use\, biodiversity\, and wildlife habitats \nSándor Némethy (University of Pécs; University of Gothenberg); László Szemethy (University of Pécs) \nDiscussant: Giuseppe lo Papa (University of Palermo) \nWoody biomass production may have both beneficial and adverse effects on cultural landscapes regarding land use\, protection and/or creation of wildlife habitats\, conservation and remediation of wastelands. Establishing energy plantations on arable lands\, natural forest areas or on grasslands is against nature conservation\, while setting up them in depleted agricultural lands of inferior quality\, polluted areas or wastelands could be advantageous for land reclamation and wildlife habitats.\nThe main forms of energy plantations include short rotation forestry (SRF)\, short rotation coppicing (SRC)\, agroforestry (AF) and polycyclic arboriculture. While short rotation forestry and short rotation coppicing have many similarities to monoculture\, traditional agroforestry and polycyclic arboriculture provide better conditions for plant biodiversity\, healthy soil formation and development of wildlife habitats. Furthermore\, the more permanent cover provides shelter and biomass for feeding\, which is especially important in winter\, the higher architectural complexity of vegetation provides more place for nesting and feeding and the forbs in the undergrowth and young shots provide better quality food for wildlife than the intensive monocultures. However\, the aforementioned intensive forms (SRF and SRC) of energy plantations can be beneficial when connected to phytoremediation of polluted land areas\, since in these cases short rotation and intensive biomass production can be desirable for fast removal of pollutants from soil and groundwater.\nDepending on the applied species\, the scale of biomass production and the energy production technologies\, woody biomass production can be an important component of renewable energy systems\, but unlikely to become the main source of renewable energy production. Therefore\, the solution is a complex management system\, which includes land use\, phytoremediation\, and a system of interlinked renewable energy sources. In this way the ecological resilience of the landscape is guaranteed through well designed agroecosystems\, where even the sufficient size of ecotones is provided in connection with natural ecosystems. \nParticipation is free. Please register on Zoom \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. \n  \nBibliography \n\nBaum\, S.\, Bolte\, A. and Weih\, M.\, “Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) Plantations Provide Additional Habitats for Vascular Plant Species in Agricultural Mosaic Landscapes”\, BioEnergy Research 5 (2012)\, 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9195-1\nCooper\, P.J.M.\, Leakey\, R.R.B.\, Rao\, M.R. and Reynolds L.\, “Agroforestry and the mitigation of land depletion in the humid and sub-humid tropics of Africa”\, Experimental Agriculture 32 (1996)\, 235-290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700026223\nLeakey\, R.R.B.\, “Definition of agroforestry revisited”\, in. R.B. Leakey (ed.) Multifunctional Agriculture – Achieving Sustainable Development in Africa. ( Academic Press\, California\, 2017)\, 5-7.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805356-0.00001-5 Némethy\, S. & Wa?as\, B. “Bioenergy crops as new components of rural and agricultural landscapes: environmental and social impact\, conservation\, cultural heritage and economy”\, Journal of Central European Green Innovation\, 3(TI) (2015): 2064-3004. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hukrgr/229424.html\nNémethy\, S. (2018): Bioenergetics in the context of society\, economy and environment (In Hungarian) Hungarian Science\, Journal of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. HU ISSN 0025 0325. 179(2018)8\, pp. 1232–1243. https://doi.org/10.1556/2065.179.2018.8.12\nRupp\, S. P.\, L. Bies\, A. Glaser\, C. Kowaleski\, T. McCoy\, T. Rentz\, S. Riffell\, J. Sibbing\, J. Verschuyl\, and T. Wigley\, Effects of bioenergy production on wildlife and wildlife habitat. Wildlife Society Technical Review 12-03 (The Wildlife Society\, Bethesda\, Maryland\, (2012).  www.wildlife.org/publications/technicalreviews\nTarr\, N.M.\, Rubino\, M.J.\, Costanza\, J.K.\, McKerrow\, A.J.\, Collazo\, J.A.\, Abt\, R.C. “Projected gains and losses of wildlife habitat from bioenergy-induced landscape change”\, BioEnergy Research 9\, (2017)\, 909-923\, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12383\n\n  \n \nSándor Némethy PhD\, biologist\, marine geologist\, strategic manager\, associate professor at University of Gothenburg\, Sweden\, University of Pécs\, Hungary and University College of Tourism and Ecology\, Sucha Beskidzka\, Poland. Research: ecosystem services and landscape management\, aquatic ecosystems\, renewable energy systems\, circular economy\, ecomuseums and landscape observatories. Teaching: Earth System Science\, soil science\, genetics and biotechnology\, wine geography\, oenotourism. Languages: Hungarian\, English\, Swedish\, Polish\, Italian. \n\n  \n  \n  \n \nLászló Szemethy PhD\, Hungarian\, biologist\, game management engineer\, full time professor at the University of Pécs. Main research topics: monitoring\, biology\, behaviour of game species; game management and wildlife conservation; conservation and socio-economic aspects of sustainable use. Leader or participant in 43 national and international research projects. 461 publications\, 553 independent citations\, Hirsch index: 13. University courses in wildlife biology and conservation\, rural development. \n\n  \nGiuseppe Lo Papa (PhD) is Aggregate Professor in Pedology\, University of Palermo\, Italy. Subject areas of hi reserach work are: Pedology\, Soil geography\, Land evaluation\, taught in the following academic courses: Forestry\, Agriculture\, Natural Sciences\, Environmental Sciences.
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-online-lecture-agroforestry-energy-plantations/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210330T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210330T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20201218T083733Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201218T083733Z
UID:5052-1617125400-1617125400@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM Lecture: Hidden landscapes
DESCRIPTION:30 March 2021\,  17:30  \nHidden landscapes\, or underground built heritage as an opportunity for territorial regeneration. The European case of the Three Countries Park (BE-NL-DE)\nby Chiara Caravello (Université de Liège) \ndiscussant: Giovangiuseppe Vannelli (University of Naples Federico II) \nThe Underground Built Heritage is a unique\, hidden cultural landscape whose spaces extend beneath and across national borders\, reflecting some of the vectors of recent European history\, in particular mining for the development of the industrial sector. It represents\, indeed\, a “socially built phenomenon” (Reichlin\, 2011) or “the hidden side of a society (…)\, invisible flows and movements at the service of the visible world” (Occhiuto\, 2020). What relationships exist between the visible and invisible parts of a [indivisible] whole? How can what the soil hides and preserves be revealed?\nThe Three Countries Park (3LP) is a landscape partnership and interregional cooperation platform bringing institutions from Belgium\, Germany\, and The Netherlands together. The lead partner\, Euregio Meuse-Rhine\, hosts the platform in Eupen (BE). Founded in 1976\, the Euregio is one of the oldest cross-border cooperation programs in Europe. The Underground Built Heritage in this area consists mostly of cavities of various typologies\, and complex networks of mining galleries from different epochs\, forming territorial capital for a common identity and rural/urban regeneration across the borders.\nThis heritage has not been well documented and explored with regard to its cross-border development potential: protection and development policies and control measures vary broadly across the borders; some sites are strongly developed for tourism\, or are protected as accessible nature reserves\, while others are rather abandoned.\nThe paper presents experiences from work conducted over the past twenty years concerning regeneration of this cross-border territory through reconsideration of the underground landscape\, starting with the project “Grünmetropole” by the Agence Ter. One main question is considered: does the shared Underground Built Heritage represent an exceptional opportunity to stimulate cross-border collaboration on sustainable territorial development\, and serve as a case to resolve the current fragmentation afflicting social-ecological transition in Europe? \nParticipation is free. Please register on Zoom \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. \n  \nBibliography \n\nBrüll\, A.\, Wirth\, T.\, Lohrberg\, F.\, et al. (2017). “Territorial cohesion thorugh cross-border landscape policy? The European case of the Three Countries Park (BE-NL-DE)”\, in C. Fürst (ed.) Change Adaptation Socio-Ecolological Systems (2017) 3:6892 Published by De Gruyter Open DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cass-2017-0007. Published online: 28 Oct 2017\nOcchiuto R.\, “What the underground says”\, in L. Genovese\, G. Pace\, R. Varriale\, (eds). Underground Cultural Heritage as a Catalyser for Regeneration Policies. Routledge Planning and Urban Design series. (2020)\nReichlin\, B.\,  “Riflessioni sulla conservazione del patrimonio architettonico del XX secolo. Tra fare storia e fare progetto”\, in B. Reichlin\, B. Pedretti\,(eds) Riuso del patrimonio architettonico. Mendrisio Academy Press\, Mendrisio (2011)\, 11-30.\nVarcin\, A.\, Helms\, K.\, Un métropolisation sans métropole : Grunmetropole. (Henri Bava\, agence Ter\, Paris-Karlsruhe)\, in Renouveler les territoires par le Paysage. Aus der Landschaft (UM) –Planen . Expérience France –Allemagne. Rapport Programme interdisciplinaire de recherche DAPA/PUCA “Architecture de la grande échelle” 4e session – Décembre 2011\n\n \nChiara has a training background in architecture conservation\, industrial heritage recovery and landscape restoration\, developed between Milan\, Liège\, and Aachen. She is completing an internship as an assistant to the project manager for the cross-border cooperation of the Three Countries Park across Germany\, Belgium\, and the Netherlands. Her research is currently focused on post-industrial cultural landscape and underground heritage as opportunity for cross-border defragmentation and sustainable territorial development.  \n\n  \nGiovangiuseppe Vannelli is architect and Ph.D. candidate in Architecture at the Department of Architecture of the University of Naples Federico II. He is part of national and international research groups with an interdisciplinary approach. His main research topics are the contemporary evolutions of cemetery and the landscapes of Italian Inner Areas\, especially in relation to the frequent seismic phenomenon.
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-lecture-hidden-landscapes/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210302T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210302T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20201215T124612Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201215T124612Z
UID:5026-1614706200-1614706200@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM Lecture: Landscape and the New Mobility Paradigm
DESCRIPTION:02 March 17:30 – 18. 30 (CET) – Zoom\nREGISTRATION \nLandscape and the New Mobility Paradigm\nby Margherita Cisani (Università degli Studi di Padova) \nRespondent: Theano S. Terkenli (University of the Aegean) \nOver the last two decades\, the social sciences have been characterized by a so called “Mobility Turn”\, as many scholars dedicated their reflections on the multiple ways in which people\, places\, objects and ideas move (or are impeded from moving) in space and time. But how has this ‘New Mobility Paradigm’ (Sheller & Urry\, 2006) affected landscape studies? And how can Landscape Studies contribute to the analysis of contemporary and historic mobilities? The proposed seminar aims to offer some answers to this issue\, revolving around the different dimensions of the relationship between landscape and movement (Cisani\, 2020). \nOn a theoretical level\, mobilizing landscape means infusing fluidity and dynamism into a concept often considered static and motionless. Considering more than representational approaches (Ingold\, 2002) as well as the political stances (Mitchell 2008; Cresswell\, 2010)\, landscape become a powerful concept\, vital and dynamic (Farinelli\, 1991; Wylie\, 2007)\, which bridges among various disciplines\, enabling and enriching a complex understanding of many contemporary processes that relate to mobility\, from commuting to tourism\, from everyday mobility practices to long distance migration and dislocation processes related to economics\, climate change\, conflicts and humanitarian crisis. \nOn a more practical and project-oriented level\, landscape and mobility are two strictly interrelated factors on which social well-being and environmental quality depend. Understanding their reciprocal interactions\, such as in the ways in which people perceive landscapes through movement\, is a key factor for just and responsible policies of landscape care\, management and transformation. \nThis issues are at the core of the strong effort that the Department of Geographical\, Historical Sciences and the Ancient World of the University of Padua is undergoing\, in terms of didactics\, research and public engagement\, carried out in particular with the new Master Degree in Landscape Studies as well as with the Centre for Advanced Studies in Mobility and the Humanities. \nParticipation is free. Please register on Zoom \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. \n  \nBibliography \n\nCisani\, M.\, Paesaggi e mobilità. Strumenti per le geografie del quotidiano (FrancoAngeli\, Milano\, 2020)\nCresswell\, T.\, “Towards a politics of mobility”\, Environment and planning D: society and space\, 28(1)\, (2010)\, 17-31.\nFarinelli\, F.\, “L’arguzia del paesaggio”\, Casabella\, 55 (1991)\, 575-576.\nMitchell\, D. (2008). “New axioms for reading the landscape: paying attention to political economy and social justice”\, in J. Wescoat and D. Johnson (eds) Political economies of landscape change (Springer\, Dordrecht\, 2008)\, 29-15.\nIngold\, T.\, The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood\, dwelling and skill (Routledge\, London\, 2002)\nSheller\, M. and Urry\, J.\, “The New Mobilities Paradigm”\, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space\, 38(2)\, (2006)\, 207–226.\nWylie\, J. Landscape (Routledge\, London\, 2007)\n\n \nMargherita Cisani is a post-doc geographer in the ‘Landscapes of Human Mobilities’ project at the MoHu Centre of the University of Padova and lecturer of Tourism Geography at the Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. She obtained her PhD in Historical\, Geographical\, Anthropological Studies\, with a thesis on the inter-relationships between everyday landscapes and collective practices of mobility\, namely walking groups. Her research interests span across landscape and mobilities studies\, with particular attention to their reciprocal influences\, in everyday landscapes and non-motorized practices of mobility\, in tourism landscapes as well as in education and public engagement. \n\n  \n\nTheano S. Terkenli | Professor and founding member of the first Department of Geography in Greece\, University of the Aegean\, since 1994. Faculty at the Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Tourism Planning\, Administration and Policy\, (University of the Aegean)\, since 1999\, and at the International Interdepartmental M.Sc. in Sustainable Tourism Development: Cultural Heritage\, Environment\, Society (Harokopeion University\, University of the Aegean\, and Université-Paris I- Panthéon Sorbonne)\, since 2018.\nPh.D. in Geography\, University of Minnesota—Twin Cities\, USA (1986-1993); M.Sc. in Landscape Architecture\, University of Wisconsin—Madison\, USA (1983-1986). Research\, publishing and teaching specialty and interests in Cultural Geography\, Landscape Geography and Critical Perspectives to Tourism.
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-lecture-landscape-and-the-new-mobility-paradigm/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210202T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210202T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20201215T123326Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201215T123326Z
UID:5018-1612287000-1612287000@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM Lecture 2: Landscape as a common good
DESCRIPTION:02 February 17:30-18.30 (CET)  – ZOOM\nLandscape as a common good: wellbeing and the historic environment\nby Claire Nolan (National University of Ireland Galway) \nRespondent: Shabnam Inanloo Dailoo (Athabasca University) \n  \nThe European Landscape Convention states that landscape is fundamental to individual and social wellbeing. It enjoins stakeholders to establish how landscape is perceived and valued in order to identify and preserve those aspects of place that promote wellbeing. Focusing on cultural heritage in particular\, this paper will discuss these themes with reference to qualitative work undertaken in 2016 and 2017 on resident and visitor perceptions of the prehistoric landscapes of Stonehenge\, Avebury and the Vale of Pewsey\, Wiltshire\, UK. It will review the phenomenological methods used to investigate participants’ embodied\, in-the-moment and everyday experiences of these heritage landscapes\, and thus the intrinsic values they hold for certain individuals. \nBased on this research\, the paper demonstrates how the disciplines of archaeology\, human geography\, and psychotherapy can combine to reveal the potential of the (pre)historic environment to facilitate ontological security\, existential relatedness and existential possibility. As a result\, it presents different understandings of the social value of cultural heritage which may help to protect and develop landscape in ways that support individual and community wellbeing. The paper further recognises that heritage landscapes can only serve the common good in this respect if the preservation and promotion of such places also mediates the other social\, environmental and infrastructural needs of the communities that live within them. Consequently\, it suggests that deeper reflection on the relationship between self and environment may assist in achieving this balance. \nBibliography \n\nCouncil of Europe. European Landscape Convention\, Strasbourg: Council of Europe (2000).\nJones\, S. & Leech\, S. 2015. Valuing the Historic Environment: a critical review of existing approaches to social value\, Manchester: AHRC Cultural Value Report (2000).\nMenatti\, L. “Landscape as a Common Good: a Philosophical and Epistemological Analysis”\, Quaderni di Careggi\, 6(6) (2014)\, 40-43.\nNolan\, C. “Sites of Existential Relatedness: Findings from Phenomenological Research at Stonehenge\, Avebury and the Vale of Pewsey\, Wiltshire\, UK”\, Public Archaeology\, 18(1) (2019)\, 28-51. DOI: 10.1080/14655187.2019.1762151\nNolan\, C. “Prehistoric Landscapes as Transitional Space”\, in T. Darvill\, K. Barrass\, L. Drysdale\, V. Heaslip and Y. Staelens\, (eds) Historic Landscapes and Mental Well-Being. Oxford: Archaeopress\, (2019)\, 163–178.\nNolan\, C. “Prehistoric Landscapes as a Source of Ontological Security for the Present Day”. Heritage and Society. 2020.\nReilly\, S.\, Nolan\, C. & Monckton\, L.\, Wellbeing and the Historic Environment. Historic England Report (2018)\, https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/wellbeing-and-the-historic-environment/wellbeing-and-historic-environment/\n\nParticipation is free. To attend the online lecture please register on Zoom \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. \n \nClaire is a public archaeology and heritage studies researcher. With training and a professional background in archaeology\, psychotherapy and community mental health\, she has a special interest in the relationship between people\, places and the past. Informed by this interdisciplinary perspective\, Claire’s work is particularly concerned with the intrinsic value of the historic environment and its influence on individual lived experience. Her research is currently focused on the social and therapeutic value of prehistoric archaeology in contemporary Europe. \n  \nDr Shabnam Inanloo Dailoo is chair of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies at Athabasca University and Associate Professor of Heritage Resources Management\, where she focuses on matter ranging from buildings and archaeological sites to cultural landscapes and sacred places\, and in particular on aboriginal cultural places\, worldviews and traditions\, where her approach is landscape-wide and values-based with a strong emphasis on community engagement.\nhttp://heritage.resources.athabascau.ca/faculty/sdailoo/
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/wdm-lecture-landscape-as-a-common-good/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210112T173000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Rome:20210112T173000
DTSTAMP:20260828T135805
CREATED:20201215T120252Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201215T120252Z
UID:5008-1610472600-1610472600@www.uniscape.eu
SUMMARY:WDM Lecture 1: Europe\, the continent of cheese
DESCRIPTION:12 January 17:30 – 18.30 (CET)\nEurope\, the continent of cheese. For how long?\nby Bas Pedroli (Wageningen University) \nDiscussant: Maura Farrell (NUI Galway) \n  \nEurope’s cultural history is a major element in European identity as reflected in its landscapes. European landscapes represent profound and continuous cultural histories. Already in early prehistory communities significantly changed their environment e.g. by animal breeding\, arable crops and extraction of iron and precious metals. The Romans brought about big changes in the landscape\, standardising holdings\, building a military road network\, serious deforestation\, novel cropping systems and farming estates.\nWhat is European in this history is that the diversity\, grounded in an extreme bio- physical diversity\, survived to a large extent\, e.g. in languages\, local markets\, traditions\, local regulations\, communal legislation. After agriculture started developing in the Middle East and Asia Minor\, long before our era\, gradually also the entire map of European landscapes was defined by the influence of agricultural communities and by the associated settlement forms. Indeed\, permanent grassland and the associated grazing livestock constitute unique features of the historical European rural landscape. Europe can be characterised as the continent of cheese! And\, to produce cheese\, grazing land\, cropland\, scattered trees and woodland were indispensable\, almost everywhere.\nThe typical farm type to manage this array of functions was the mixed family farm\, which dominated European agriculture for several centuries. Many variations of this system still exist. Today they all struggle to survive under current market pressures\, but they still contribute to the diversity of the European landscape. However\, without a vision on future development of land use\, the mosaic of Europe’s unique landscape will gradually vanish like the colours of a worn carpet. This lecture will discuss the continuity of this landscape\, based on the opportunities of a community-oriented landscape management\, in search of new\, suitable colours for the future landscape. \nParticipation is free. To attend the online lecture please register HERE \nAfter registering\, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the lecture on Zoom. \n  \nBibliography \n\nGalan\, J.\, Bourgeau\, F. & Pedroli\, B. (2020): “A multidimensional model for the Vernacular: Linking disciplines and connecting the vernacular landscape to sustainability challenges.” Sustainability 12\, 6347; doi:10.3390/su12166347\nPedroli\, B. (2019): “Natural Heritage Management\, or is it Cultural Heritage after all? Towards new commons and sharing interests in the landscape”. Ex Novo Journal of Archaeology 4: 13-22.\nPrimdahl\, J.\, Pinto-Correia\, T. & Pedroli\, B. (2019): “European Landscapes in Transition: implications for policy integration and landscape governance”. EuroChoices\, 18 (3): 18-23. doi: 10.1111/1746-692X.12211\nAngelstam\, P.\, Elbakidze\, M.\, Axelsson\, M.R.\, Khoroshev\, A.\, Pedroli\, B.\, Tysiachniouk\, M.\, & Zabubenin E. (2019): “Model Forests in Russia as landscape approach: demonstration projects or initiatives for learning towards sustainable forest management?” Forest Policy & Economics 101: 96-110. doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.005.\nVan der Sluis\, T.\, Pedroli\, B.\, Frederiksen\, P.\, Kristensen\, S.B.P.\, Busck\, A.G.\, Pavlis\, V. and Cosor\, G.L. (2019): “The impact of European landscape transitions on the provision of landscape services: an explorative study using six cases of rural land change” Landscape Ecology 34(2)\, 307-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0765-2\nMetzger\, M.J.\, Lindner\, M.\, & Pedroli\, B. (2018): “Towards a roadmap for sustainable land use in Europe”. Regional Environmental Change 18(3)\, 707-713. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1285-y\nFrederiksen\, P.\, T. van der Sluis\, A. Vadineanu\, T.S. Terkenli\, V. Gaube\, A. Gravsholt Busck\, J.P. Vesterager\, N. Geamana\, D.E. Schistou\, B. Pedroli (2017): “Misfits and compliance patterns in the transposition and implementation of the Habitats Directive—four cases”. Land Use Policy 62: 337-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.010\nPedroli\, B.\, T. Pinto Correia & J. Primdahl (2016): “Challenges for a shared European countryside of uncertain future. Towards a modern community-based landscape perspective”. Landscape Research 41(4): 450-460. doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2016.1156072\n\n  \n\n Dr Bas Pedroli is a motivating project leader of interdisciplinary teams in land use\, spatial planning\, landscape\, heritage and biodiversity research\, regional and urban development and monitoring approaches. More specifically\, he has experience with integrated land use planning and policy analysis\, future studies\, model forest studies\, land use governance issues\, nature conservation value assessment\, biodiversity assessment\, integrated floodplain management studies\, including the associated institutional aspects of such topics. As an acknowledged expert in the area of land use planning and landscape assessment at international level\, he is asked regularly for presiding scientific and land use planning workshops\, and for key note addresses in conferences. He is engaged enthusiastically in supporting policies for landscape management and nature conservation planning from a sustainable development perspective\, including the required participative and collaborative research approaches. He is initiator of several scientific networks\, such as UNISCAPE\, Landscape Europe and Petrarca\, having a keen interest in providing underpinning of the philosophy of the European Landscape Convention.\nCurrently he is active in research and consultation on behalf of Just Landscape\, and as an associate professor Spatial Planning at Wageningen University.
URL:https://www.uniscape.eu/event-list/where-disciplines-meet-online-lecture-1/
CATEGORIES:Online Lecture
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR